Submit Your Tissue Repair and Regeneration Research
Join leading researchers advancing regenerative medicine, wound healing, and tissue engineering through rigorous peer-reviewed publication
Two Convenient Submission Methods
We offer flexible submission options designed to accommodate your workflow. Choose the method that best suits your needs-both provide the same rigorous peer review process and expert editorial handling.
ManuscriptZone Portal
Our comprehensive manuscript management system provides complete control and transparency throughout the submission and review process.
- Auto-save functionality protects your work
- Real-time submission status tracking
- Direct access to reviewer comments and editor decisions
- Guided workflow ensures completeness
- Secure document management
- Revision tracking and version control
Best for: Authors seeking complete manuscript tracking, those submitting complex studies with multiple files, or researchers managing multiple submissions.
Submit via ManuscriptZoneQuick Submission Form
A streamlined submission process for straightforward manuscripts, allowing you to submit your research quickly without account creation.
- No account registration required
- Simple, intuitive interface
- Fast submission process
- Ideal for single-file manuscripts
- Immediate confirmation
- Automatic transfer to editorial system
Best for: First-time submitters, straightforward research articles, or authors preferring a simplified submission experience.
Use Quick Submission FormArticle Types We Publish
The Journal of Tissue Repair and Regeneration welcomes diverse manuscript types across regenerative medicine, wound healing, tissue engineering, and related disciplines. Each submission undergoes rigorous peer review by experts in your specific research area.
Original Research Articles
Novel findings in tissue regeneration, stem cell biology, biomaterials, wound healing mechanisms, or regenerative therapies. Present comprehensive experimental studies with robust methodology.
Systematic Reviews & Meta-Analyses
Comprehensive evidence synthesis on regenerative medicine interventions, tissue engineering approaches, or wound healing treatments following PRISMA guidelines.
Clinical Studies
Clinical trials, observational studies, or case series evaluating regenerative therapies, tissue-engineered products, or wound healing interventions in human subjects.
Methods & Protocols
Novel experimental techniques, biomaterial fabrication methods, tissue culture protocols, or analytical approaches advancing regenerative medicine research.
Short Communications
Preliminary findings, novel observations, or time-sensitive discoveries in tissue repair and regeneration requiring rapid dissemination.
Case Reports
Unique clinical cases involving regenerative therapies, unusual wound healing presentations, or novel applications of tissue engineering approaches.
Review Articles
Comprehensive overviews of current knowledge in specific areas of tissue repair, regenerative medicine, biomaterials, or wound healing science.
Perspectives & Commentaries
Expert opinions on emerging trends, controversial topics, or future directions in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering fields.
Pre-Submission Checklist
Ensure your manuscript is complete and properly formatted before submission. This checklist helps streamline the editorial process and accelerates your path to publication.
Word (.docx) or LaTeX format, properly structured with all sections complete
High-resolution images (300 DPI minimum), TIFF or EPS format, properly labeled
IRB/IACUC approval for human/animal studies, informed consent documented
Authorship contributions defined, all co-authors approved final manuscript
Financial relationships, conflicts of interest, or funding sources disclosed
Citations complete and accurate, following journal reference style guidelines
Significance statement, novelty description, suggested reviewers included
Additional data files, videos, or protocols properly formatted and labeled
Important: For studies involving human subjects or animal models, ensure compliance with ethical guidelines (Declaration of Helsinki, ARRIVE guidelines) and include approval documentation.
Peer Review Timeline
We are committed to providing timely, constructive feedback while maintaining rigorous quality standards. Our transparent review process keeps you informed at every stage.
Submission Received
Your manuscript enters our editorial system. You receive immediate confirmation with a unique manuscript ID for tracking.
Day 0Initial Editorial Screening
Editor-in-Chief reviews manuscript for scope, completeness, and adherence to guidelines. Plagiarism check performed using iThenticate.
Days 1-3Expert Reviewer Assignment
Manuscript assigned to 2-3 independent reviewers with expertise in tissue repair, regenerative medicine, or your specific research area.
Days 4-7Peer Review Process
Reviewers evaluate methodology, results, significance, and contribution to the field. Detailed feedback provided on scientific merit and presentation.
Days 8-21Editorial Decision
Editor synthesizes reviewer feedback and makes decision: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject. You receive detailed comments and recommendations.
Days 22-28Revision & Re-review
If revisions requested, you submit revised manuscript with point-by-point response. Reviewers assess changes and provide final recommendation.
Days 29-42Final Acceptance & Production
Accepted manuscripts enter production for copyediting, typesetting, and final formatting. Proofs sent for author approval.
Days 43-52Online Publication
Your article is published online with DOI assignment, immediately accessible worldwide through open access. Indexed in major databases.
Days 53-60Average time from submission to publication: 60 days for manuscripts requiring minor revisions. Fast-track review available for time-sensitive discoveries.
Why Researchers Choose JTRR
We provide the quality, visibility, and support your research deserves
Comprehensive Indexing
Indexed in Google Scholar for maximum discoverability
Fast Decisions
Average 21 days to first decision-among the fastest in regenerative medicine publishing
Expert Reviewers
Peer review by leading researchers in tissue engineering, stem cell biology, and wound healing
Global Open Access
Immediate worldwide visibility with no subscription barriers-maximize your research impact
Ethical Standards
Committed to COPE publication ethics, transparency, and research integrity
APC Waivers Available
Financial support for researchers from low-income countries and unfunded studies
What Happens After Submission?
Initial Editorial Assessment
Within 3 days of submission, our Editor-in-Chief conducts an initial assessment evaluating:
- Alignment with journal scope (tissue repair, regeneration, wound healing, biomaterials)
- Scientific rigor and methodological soundness
- Novelty and significance to the field
- Completeness of manuscript and supporting documentation
- Originality verification through plagiarism screening (iThenticate)
Manuscripts with similarity index exceeding 30% are returned for revision before peer review. Studies outside journal scope receive immediate feedback with suggestions for more appropriate venues.
Peer Review Process
Manuscripts passing initial screening are assigned to 2-3 independent reviewers selected for their expertise in your specific research area. Our reviewer pool includes:
- Academic researchers in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine
- Clinical specialists in wound healing and reconstructive therapies
- Biomaterials scientists and bioengineers
- Stem cell biologists and developmental biologists
- Translational researchers bridging basic science and clinical application
Reviewers provide detailed feedback on experimental design, data interpretation, statistical analysis, and manuscript presentation. We employ single-blind peer review to ensure objective evaluation while protecting reviewer anonymity.
Editorial Decision Categories
Accept: Manuscript meets all quality standards and requires no further changes. Proceeds directly to production.
Minor Revision: Manuscript is fundamentally sound but requires small improvements (clarifications, additional references, minor data presentation changes). Typically resolved within 2 weeks.
Major Revision: Manuscript has merit but requires substantial improvements (additional experiments, expanded discussion, significant restructuring). Authors given 6-8 weeks for revision.
Reject: Manuscript does not meet publication standards due to fundamental flaws, insufficient novelty, or scope mismatch. Detailed feedback provided to guide future submissions.
Revision and Resubmission
If revisions are requested, you will receive:
- Detailed reviewer comments with specific improvement recommendations
- Editor's synthesis highlighting critical issues requiring attention
- Clear deadline for revised manuscript submission
- Guidelines for preparing point-by-point response to reviewers
Revised manuscripts undergo re-review by the same reviewers when possible, ensuring continuity and fair assessment of changes. Most manuscripts requiring minor revisions receive final decisions within 14 days of resubmission.
Production and Publication
Accepted manuscripts enter our production workflow:
- Copyediting: Professional editing for clarity, grammar, and adherence to journal style
- Typesetting: Conversion to final publication format with professional layout
- Proof Review: Authors receive proofs for final approval and correction
- DOI Assignment: Permanent digital identifier assigned for citation and tracking
- Online Publication: Immediate online publication with open access availability
- Database Indexing: Automatic submission to PubMed, Scopus, and other databases
Average production time: 10 days from acceptance to online publication.
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Structure and Formatting
Organize your manuscript following standard scientific article structure:
- Title Page: Concise, descriptive title; full author names and affiliations; corresponding author contact information
- Abstract: 250-300 words summarizing background, methods, results, and conclusions
- Keywords: 5-8 terms for indexing and searchability
- Introduction: Research context, knowledge gaps, study objectives
- Materials and Methods: Detailed methodology enabling replication
- Results: Clear presentation of findings with appropriate statistics
- Discussion: Interpretation, limitations, implications, future directions
- Conclusions: Key takeaways and significance
- References: Complete citations in Vancouver or APA style
Figures and Tables
High-quality visual elements enhance manuscript impact:
- Figures: TIFF or EPS format, 300 DPI minimum resolution, RGB color mode
- Tables: Editable format (Word or Excel), clear headers, appropriate statistics
- Legends: Comprehensive descriptions enabling standalone interpretation
- Numbering: Sequential order matching text citations
- Size: Appropriate for single or double-column layout
Ethical Requirements
All research must comply with ethical standards:
- Human Studies: IRB approval, informed consent, Declaration of Helsinki compliance
- Animal Studies: IACUC approval, ARRIVE guidelines adherence, humane treatment protocols
- Cell Lines: Authentication documentation, source verification
- Data Availability: Statement on data sharing and access
- Conflicts of Interest: Complete disclosure of financial relationships
Need Assistance?
Our editorial team is here to support you throughout the submission process. Whether you have questions about manuscript preparation, submission procedures, or journal policies, we're ready to help.
Contact us: [email protected]
