Reviewer Resources
IJCY provides reviewers with guidance and tools to deliver consistent, constructive feedback.
Resources are aligned with journal standards and reporting requirements.
Why Researchers Trust Us
Fast Publication
Average 4 weeks to first decision, 3 weeks to publication after acceptance
Expert Review
35+ editorial board members specializing in cytokine biology and immunology
Global Reach
Research disseminated to immunology professionals in 45+ countries immediately
Rigorous Standards
Double-blind peer review ensuring highest scientific quality and reproducibility
Journal at a Glance
International Journal of Cytokine publishes research that advances understanding of immune signaling, inflammation, and translational immunology. The journal emphasizes rigorous methodology, clear reporting, and clinical relevance to support evidence based care.
Our publishing model combines rapid editorial triage with expert peer review so that cytokine research can move from discovery to application efficiently.
- Peer reviewed open access journal focused on cytokine science.
- Double blind peer review and structured editorial decisions.
- DOI assignment and metadata delivery for discoverability.
- Global readership across immunology and clinical communities.
Quality and Transparency Commitment
Quality assurance is embedded throughout the IJCY workflow. Editorial screening, ethical checks, and reviewer guidance ensure that published results are credible, reproducible, and clinically meaningful.
Authors receive clear decision letters and detailed revision guidance, helping them improve manuscripts and communicate findings with precision.
- Structured reviewer criteria and decision templates.
- Integrity checks for originality and data clarity.
- Transparent timelines and consistent communication.
Reviewer Toolkit
Review Checklist
Step by step criteria for evaluating methodology and reporting.
Decision Templates
Structured formats to organize feedback.
Reporting Standards
Guidance for clinical trials, observational studies, and reviews.
Ethics Guidance
Policies for conflicts, consent, and data integrity.
Best Practice Tips
High quality reviews focus on evidence and clarity. Provide actionable recommendations and avoid subjective language.
- Separate major and minor comments.
- Reference figures or tables when relevant.
- Highlight limitations and data gaps.
Concise, well organized feedback helps authors address revisions efficiently.
Review Quality Checklist
- Is the study design appropriate for the research question?
- Are statistical methods described and justified?
- Do conclusions align with the data presented?
- Are ethical approvals and consent statements provided?
Support from IJCY
Reviewers can contact the editorial office for guidance on scope, ethics, or reporting standards.
If a manuscript falls outside your expertise, notify the editor promptly.
Additional templates and examples are available upon request.
Support helps reviewers deliver consistent, high quality feedback.
Request Reviewer Resources
Reviewer Support
Email the editorial office for the latest reviewer templates and guidance. We can provide updated checklists on request.
[email protected]
