Reviewer Resources
The International Journal of Glaucoma equips reviewers with practical tools to deliver high quality evaluations. These resources help reviewers focus on scientific rigor and clinical impact.
We are committed to making the review process efficient and constructive.
Resources to support high quality reviews
IJG provides reviewers with guidance and tools that simplify the review process and support consistent evaluations. These resources promote thorough, fair, and efficient feedback.
Checklists and reporting guidance
- Reporting guidelines for clinical trials and observational studies
- Structured review templates that align with editorial expectations
- Ethics reminders for consent, conflicts, and data integrity
Ethics resources
Reviewers can consult ethics guidance when encountering potential integrity issues. The editorial office provides support for complex cases.
Data and reproducibility
We encourage reviewers to assess data availability statements and transparency of methods to strengthen reproducibility.
Sample review forms
Structured review templates are available on request and can help reviewers organize comments in a format that editors can act on quickly.
Statistical review support
When statistical methods are complex, reviewers may suggest additional statistical checks or request clarifications to ensure validity.
For imaging studies, reviewers should confirm that image processing steps are described and that any enhancements are clearly reported.
Reviewer Support Tools
Reporting Checklists
Use structured guidance to evaluate methods, results, and clinical interpretation.
Ethics Support
Access to editorial guidance for conflicts, consent, and integrity concerns.
Data Review
Assess data availability and reproducibility to strengthen the evidence base.
Need Assistance During Review
If you need additional resources or have questions during a review, contact the editorial office for assistance.
The editorial office can provide reporting guideline links based on the study design.
We can also share sample decision language if needed.
Ask for statistical review checklists when appropriate.
Guidance is available for complex imaging studies.
Checklists reduce variability.
Templates standardize comments.
Use these tools for consistency.
Ask questions anytime.
Need Guidance From Our Editorial Team
We are happy to clarify policies, submission routes, and editorial requirements.
[email protected]Contact The Editorial Office
We can provide additional guidance or answer questions about reviewer expectations.
